LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeHealth and Safety CodeDiv. 45Pt. 2Ch. 8Art. 7§ 79820 Property Owner Liability Presumption

§ 79820 Property Owner Liability Presumption

Health and Safety Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryVerified

§ 79820 Property Owner Liability Presumption

Key Takeaways

  • •If a check of your land finds no dangerous chemicals, but later some are found, you’re assumed not to blame unless someone proves otherwise.
  • •This rule applies whether the state or a private person is trying to make you pay for cleanup.
  • •The other side can only win if they show strong proof that the first check missed something or was wrong.

Example

You buy an old gas station. The state checks it and says there’s no oil or chemicals left in the ground. Two years later, oil leaks into the soil. The state sues you to pay for cleanup.

The law says you’re not automatically guilty. The state has to prove that the first check was wrong or that you caused the leak later.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 79820 Property Owner Liability Presumption

(a) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, if an environmental assessment of property discovers no evidence of the presence or likely presence of a release or a threat of a release of a hazardous substance, and a hazardous substance release is subsequently discovered on, to, or from that property, the owner of that property is entitled to a rebuttable presumption, affecting the burden of producing evidence, that the owner is not a liable person or responsible party for purposes of this part. An owner is entitled to this presumption whether the action is brought by the state or by a private party seeking contribution or indemnification. (b) In an action brought against an owner of property to recover costs or expenditures incurred from the state account pursuant to this part in response to a hazardous substance release, the presumption may be rebutted if it is established by a preponderance of the evidence that the facts upon which the department made the certification pursuant to subdivision (a), (b), (c), or (d) of Section 79825 are true. (Added by Stats. 2022, Ch. 257, Sec. 2. (AB 2293) Effective January 1, 2023. Operative January 1, 2024, pursuant to Sec. 4 of Stats. 2022, Ch. 257.)

Last verified: January 24, 2026

Key Terms

contaminationsubstancepresumptionevidenceenvironmentalreleasehazardousproperty

Related Statutes

  • § 79825 Owner Liability For Hazardous Releases
  • § 79790 Property Owner Liability Presumption
  • § 79800 Rebuttal Of Hazardous Release Presumption
  • § 79795 Hazardous Substance Cost Recovery
  • § 79885 Liability Release Conditions

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Health and Safety Code. Section 79820.
View Official Source