LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeGovernment CodeCh. 2.5Art. 4§ 68772 Judicial Conduct Commission Review

§ 68772 Judicial Conduct Commission Review

Government Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryVerified

§ 68772 Judicial Conduct Commission Review

Key Takeaways

  • •A group of people (the committee) is studying how to make the group that watches over judges (the commission) work better.
  • •They have to listen to what regular people think by holding at least two meetings where anyone can talk.
  • •They will look at things like how many people are on the commission, how they punish bad judges, and if they have enough money to do their job.
  • •They must finish their report and share it with important people and the public by March 30, 2023.

Example

Imagine your school has a group of teachers who make sure all the other teachers are doing a good job and being fair. One day, the principal says this group isn’t working well enough and asks some parents and students to help figure out how to make it better.

This law is like that. A committee is looking at the group that makes sure judges are doing their jobs right. They have to listen to what regular people think and then tell everyone what changes should be made.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 68772 Judicial Conduct Commission Review

The committee shall study and make recommendations for changes in the operations and structure of the commission that would improve the commission’s ability to carry out its mission to protect the public, enforce rigorous standards of judicial conduct, and maintain public confidence in the integrity and independence of the judiciary. (a) As part of its study pursuant to this section, the committee shall, at a minimum, do all of the following: (1) Review and consider the following: (A) All findings and recommendations of the California State Auditor in Audit 2016-137. (B) The existing structure and operations of the commission. (C) The existing structures and operations of judicial discipline commissions of other states that are similar in population to the State of California. (2) Hold at least two hearings to accept comments from the public about possible changes in the operations and structure of the commission that would improve the commission’s ability to carry out its mission to protect the public, enforce rigorous standards of judicial conduct, and maintain public confidence in the integrity and independence of the judiciary. (A) Hold at least one hearing, prior to the committee completing its study or formulating its tentative recommendations pursuant to this section, to allow the committee to accept the public’s suggestions for possible changes in the operations and structure of the commission. (B) Hold at least one hearing, after completing its study and formulating its tentative recommendations for possible changes in the operations and structure of the commission but prior to completing its study pursuant to subdivision (b), to allow the committee to accept the public’s comments about its tentative recommendations. The committee shall provide the public with notice of its tentative recommendations in advance of the hearing by, among other methods, providing a copy of the tentative recommendations to any person who provides contact information to the committee and either requests to be notified of the committee’s tentative recommendations, or provides written suggestions for possible changes in the operations and structure of the commission pursuant to subparagraph (A), and transmitting the tentative recommendations to the commission in a time period that allows the commission to post the tentative recommendations on its internet website at least 10 calendar days prior to the hearing. (C) The public meetings described in this subparagraph shall comply with the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Article 9 (commencing with Section 11120) of Chapter 1 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code). (3) Study and make recommendations whether any of the following should be changed in order to improve the commission’s ability to carry out its mission to protect the public, enforce rigorous standards of judicial conduct, and maintain public confidence in the integrity and independence of the judiciary: (A) The number of commission members. (B) The allocation of appointments to the commission among the appointing authorities. (C) The structure of the commission. (D) The appropriate discipline and remedies available to the commission when it imposes discipline. (E) The policies and procedures governing the commission’s operations. (F) Whether the commission currently has adequate financial and personnel resources. (G) What, if any, specific funding is necessary to support any recommended improvements to the commission. (H) Whether changes to the Constitution and statutes of the State of California, Rules of Court, and rules of the commission are needed. (4) Seek input on its study from all of the following: (A) All three branches of government. (B) Judges. (C) Attorneys admitted to the State Bar of California. (D) Members of the commission. (E) The public. (b) All members of the committee shall serve without compensation. Members of the committee shall be reimbursed for their necessary expenses, including expenses for travel, food, and lodging, incurred in connection with their committee duties. (c) Support for the committee shall be provided by staff of the commission. (d) The committee shall complete its study and provide a written report about its findings and recommendations no later than March 30, 2023, to the following: (1) The Governor. (2) The commission. (3) The Supreme Court. (4) The President pro Tempore of the Senate and the Chair of the Senate Committee on Judiciary. (5) The Speaker of the Assembly and the Chair of the Assembly Committee on Judiciary. (6) The public, including by providing the report to the commission, so that the commission may make the report available on the commission’s internet website. (Added by Stats. 2021, Ch. 79, Sec. 16. (AB 143) Effective July 16, 2021.)

Last verified: January 22, 2026

Key Terms

performancecommissionhearingcommitteeabilityconfidenceintegrityindependence

Related Statutes

  • § 68701.1 Judicial Misconduct Investigation
  • § 68770 Judicial Performance Review Committee
  • § 8273 Youth Policy Commission Duties
  • § 25211.4 County Service Area Formation
  • § 50621 Annexation Hearing Notice Requirements

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Government Code. Section 68772.
View Official Source