LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeGovernment CodeDiv. 4Ch. 10.7Art. 3§ 3542 Judicial Review Of Unit Determinations

§ 3542 Judicial Review Of Unit Determinations

Government Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryReview recommended

§ 3542 Judicial Review Of Unit Determinations

Key Takeaways

  • •Employers or worker groups can't usually challenge a board's decision about who is in a work group, unless the board agrees it's a big deal or it's part of a complaint about unfair treatment.
  • •If someone is unhappy with a final decision about unfair treatment at work, they can ask a court to look at it, but they have to do it within 30 days.
  • •The court can make the board's decision stronger, change it, or cancel it, but it can't change the facts the board found if there's good evidence.
  • •If someone doesn't follow the board's final decision, the board can ask a court to make them follow it.

Example

A group of workers thinks their boss treated them unfairly by not letting them form a union. They complain to the board, but the board says the boss did nothing wrong.

If the workers don't agree with the board's decision, they can ask a court to look at it. But they have to do this within 30 days. The court can then decide if the board was right or wrong, but it can't change the facts the board found if there's good evidence. If the boss still doesn't follow the board's decision, the board can ask the court to make the boss follow it.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 3542 Judicial Review Of Unit Determinations

(a) No employer or employee organization shall have the right to judicial review of a unit determination except: (1) when the board in response to a petition from an employer or employee organization, agrees that the case is one of special importance and joins in the request for such review; or (2) when the issue is raised as a defense to an unfair practice complaint. A board order directing an election shall not be stayed pending judicial review. Upon receipt of a board order joining in the request for judicial review, a party to the case may petition for a writ of extraordinary relief from the unit determination decision or order. (b) Any charging party, respondent, or intervenor aggrieved by a final decision or order of the board in an unfair practice case, except a decision of the board not to issue a complaint in such a case, may petition for a writ of extraordinary relief from such decision or order. (c) Such petition shall be filed in the district court of appeal in the appellate district where the unit determination or unfair practice dispute occurred. The petition shall be filed within 30 days after issuance of the board’s final order, order denying reconsideration, or order joining in the request for judicial review, as applicable. Upon the filing of such petition, the court shall cause notice to be served upon the board and thereupon shall have jurisdiction of the proceeding. The board shall file in the court the record of the proceeding, certified by the board, within 10 days after the clerk’s notice unless such time is extended by the court for good cause shown. The court shall have jurisdiction to grant to the board such temporary relief or restraining order it deems just and proper and in like manner to make and enter a decree enforcing, modifying, or setting aside the order of the board. The findings of the board with respect to questions of fact, including ultimate facts, if supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole, are conclusive. The provisions of Title 1 (commencing with Section 1067) of Part 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure relating to writs shall, except where specifically superseded herein, apply to proceedings pursuant to this section. (d) If the time to petition for extraordinary relief from a board decision has expired, the board may seek enforcement of any final decision or order in a district court of appeal or a superior court in the district where the unit determination or unfair practice case occurred. The board shall respond within 10 days to any inquiry from a party to the action as to why the board has not sought court enforcement of the final decision or order. If the response does not indicate that there has been compliance with the board’s final decision or order, the board shall seek enforcement of the final decision or order upon the request of the party. The board shall file in the court the record of the proceeding, certified by the board, and appropriate evidence disclosing the failure to comply with the decision or order. If, after hearing, the court determines that the order was issued pursuant to procedures established by the board and that the person or entity refuses to comply with the order, the court shall enforce such order by writ of mandamus. The court shall not review the merits of the order. (Amended by Stats. 1980, Ch. 1265.)

Last verified: January 22, 2026

Key Terms

petitionwrit of extraordinary reliefterminationemployerrestraining orderconsiderationappealport

Related Statutes

  • § 3509.5 Appeals Of Board Decisions
  • § 71825.1 Appeals Of Board Decisions
  • § 3520 Judicial Review Of Unit Determinations
  • § 3524.73 Judicial Review Of Unit Determinations
  • § 3564 Judicial Review Of Unit Determinations

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Government Code. Section 3542.
View Official Source