LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeFinancial CodeDiv. 2Ch. 1Art. 5§ 5323 Asset Preservation Orders

§ 5323 Asset Preservation Orders

Financial Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryVerified

§ 5323 Asset Preservation Orders

Key Takeaways

  • •The government can ask a court to freeze property if they think it was involved in a crime, so no one can sell or hide it while the case is going on.
  • •Before freezing property, the court must give notice to everyone involved and hold a hearing to decide if it's really necessary.
  • •The court will decide based on whether the government is likely to win the case and if freezing the property is more important for the public than the harm it might cause the owner.
  • •The court must make sure the owner can still pay for their lawyer to fight the case.

Example

If the police think someone bought a fancy car with money from selling drugs, they can ask a court to stop that person from selling the car until the trial is over.

The court will check if there's a good reason to believe the car was bought with drug money and if freezing it is more important for the public than the harm it causes the car owner. The owner can still use some money to pay their lawyer.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 5323 Asset Preservation Orders

(a) Concurrent with, or subsequent to, the filing of the petition, the prosecuting agency may move the superior court for the following pendente lite orders to preserve the status quo of the property alleged in the petition of forfeiture: (1) An injunction to restrain all interested parties and enjoin them from transferring, encumbering, hypothecating or otherwise disposing of that property. (2) Appointment of a receiver to take possession of, care for, manage, and operate the assets and properties so that such property may be maintained and preserved. (b) No preliminary injunction may be granted or receiver appointed without notice, that meets the requirements of Section 5321, to all the interested parties, including actual notice to targets of the anticipated criminal action, and a hearing to determine that such an order is necessary to preserve the property, pending the outcome of the criminal proceedings, and that there is probable cause to believe that the property alleged in the forfeiture proceedings are proceeds or property interests forfeitable under Section 5320. However, a temporary restraining order may issue pending that hearing pursuant to the provisions of Section 527 of the Code of Civil Procedure. (1) In determining whether to issue a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order in a proceeding brought by a prosecuting agency in conjunction with or subsequent to the underlying criminal proceeding, the court shall weigh the relative degree of certainty of the outcome on the merits and the consequences to each of the parties of granting the interim relief. If the prosecution is likely to prevail on the merits and the potential harm to the public outweighs the potential harm to the defendants and the interested parties, the court should grant injunctive relief. The court shall give significant weight to the following factors: (A) The public interest in preserving liquid capital and other financial assets pendente lite. (B) The difficulty of preserving financial assets pendente lite where the underlying alleged crimes involve issues of fraud and moral turpitude. (C) The fact that the requested relief is being sought by a public prosecutor on behalf of alleged victims of financial crimes. (D) The likelihood that substantial public harm has occurred where financial crimes are alleged to have been committed. (2) In determining whether to issue a permanent injunction or temporary restraining order in a proceeding brought by a prosecuting agency before the filing of a complaint in the underlying criminal proceeding, the court shall weigh the relative degree of certainty of the outcome on the merits and the consequences to each of the parties of granting the interim relief. (3) No injunctive order issued under this section shall impair the ability of a defendant or interested party to pay the actual legal fees or retainer for his or her legal defense to the criminal charges and the petition for forfeiture. (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the court in granting these motions may order a surety bond or undertaking to preserve the property interests of the interested parties, but the court shall give significant weight to the unique circumstances of public agencies, as opposed to private litigants, in determining whether to order a surety bond or undertaking. (d) The court shall, in making its orders, seek to protect the interests of those who may be involved in the same enterprise as the defendant, but who were not involved in the commission of the violation of a crime enumerated in Section 5320. (Amended by Stats. 1992, Ch. 1280, Sec. 3. Effective January 1, 1993.)

Last verified: January 23, 2026

Key Terms

injunctiondefendantfraudpropertypossessionrestraining ordercrimehearing

Related Statutes

  • § 5322 Property Claim Filing Procedure
  • § 5320 Property Forfeiture For Lending Crimes
  • § 5321 Forfeiture Petition Filing
  • § 5324 Property Forfeiture Declaration
  • § 5325 Forfeiture Proceeds Distribution

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Financial Code. Section 5323.
View Official Source