LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeFamily CodeDiv. 9Pt. 2Ch. 2Art. 2§ 4063 Child Support Cost Reimbursement

§ 4063 Child Support Cost Reimbursement

Family Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryVerified

§ 4063 Child Support Cost Reimbursement

This law explains how parents must share extra costs for their kids, like medical bills or daycare, after a divorce or separation. It says how to ask for money back and what happens if someone doesn’t pay.

Key Takeaways

  • •Parents must share extra costs for kids, like doctor visits or daycare, based on what the court says.
  • •The parent who pays first must send the bill to the other parent with proof of payment.
  • •The other parent usually has 30 days to pay their share. If they don’t, the parent who paid can take them to court.
  • •If a parent uses a doctor or daycare not covered by insurance, they might have to pay the extra cost themselves.
  • •If a parent can’t pay all at once, the court can set up a payment plan.

Example

Mom takes her kid to the doctor, and the visit costs $200. The court order says Dad must pay half.

Mom pays the $200 first, then sends Dad the bill. Dad has 30 days to pay his $100 share. If he doesn’t, Mom can take him to court to make him pay.

How to Calculate

No specific formula is given, but the law says costs must be split based on the court order (e.g., 50/50 or another percentage).

  1. Check the court order to see what percentage each parent must pay (e.g., 50% each).
  2. Add up the total cost (e.g., $200 for a doctor visit).
  3. Multiply the total cost by each parent’s percentage to find out how much they owe.
  4. The parent who paid first sends the bill to the other parent for their share.

A court order says Dad pays 60% and Mom pays 40% of extra costs. The kid’s daycare costs $500 this month.

Result: Dad owes $300 (500 x 0.60), and Mom owes $200 (500 x 0.40). If Mom paid the $500, she can ask Dad for his $300.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 4063 Child Support Cost Reimbursement

(a) When making an order pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 4062, the court shall: (1) Advise each parent, in writing or on the record, of the parent’s rights and liabilities, including financial responsibilities. (2) Include in its order the time period for a parent to reimburse the other parent for the reimbursing parent’s share of the reasonable additional child support costs subject to the requirements of this section. (b) Unless there has been an assignment of rights pursuant to Section 11477 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, when either parent accrues or pays costs pursuant to an order under this section, that parent shall provide the other parent with an itemized statement of the costs within a reasonable time, but not more than 90 days after accruing the costs. These costs shall then be paid as follows: (1) If a parent has already paid all of these costs, that parent shall provide proof of payment and a request for reimbursement of that parent’s court-ordered share to the other parent. (2) If a parent has paid the parent’s court-ordered share of the costs only, that parent shall provide proof of payment to the other parent, request the other parent to pay the remainder of the costs directly to the provider, and provide the reimbursing parent with any necessary information about how to make the payment to the provider. (3) The other parent shall make the reimbursement or pay the remaining costs within the time period specified by the court, or, if no period is specified, within a reasonable time not to exceed 30 days from notification of the amount due, or according to any payment schedule set by the health care provider for either parent unless the parties agree in writing to another payment schedule or the court finds good cause for setting another payment schedule. (4) If the reimbursing parent disputes a request for payment, that parent shall pay the requested amount and thereafter may seek judicial relief under this section and Section 290. If the reimbursing parent fails to pay the other parent as required by this subdivision, the other parent may seek judicial relief under this section and Section 290. (c) Either parent may file a noticed motion to enforce an order issued pursuant to this section. In addition to the court’s powers under Section 290, the court may award filing costs and reasonable attorney’s fees if it finds that either party acted without reasonable cause regarding the party’s obligations pursuant to this section. (d) There is a rebuttable presumption that the costs actually paid for the uninsured health care needs of the children and for childcare that is for employment or reasonably necessary for education or training for employment skills are reasonable, except as provided in subdivision (e). (e) Except as provided in subdivision (g): (1) The health care insurance coverage, including, but not limited to, coverage for emergency treatment, provided by a parent pursuant to a court order, shall be the coverage to be utilized at all times, consistent with the requirements of that coverage, unless the other parent can show that the health care insurance coverage is inadequate to meet the child’s needs. (2) If either parent obtains health care insurance coverage in addition to that provided pursuant to the court order, that parent shall bear sole financial responsibility for the costs of that additional coverage and the costs of any care or treatment obtained pursuant thereto in excess of the costs that would have been incurred under the health care insurance coverage provided for in the court order. (f) Except as provided in subdivision (g): (1) If the health care insurance coverage provided by a parent pursuant to a court order designates a preferred health care provider, that preferred provider shall be used at all times, consistent with the terms and requirements of that coverage. (2) If either parent uses a health care provider other than the preferred provider inconsistent with the terms and requirements of the court-ordered health care insurance coverage, the parent obtaining that care shall bear the sole responsibility for any nonreimbursable health care costs in excess of the costs that would have been incurred under the court-ordered health care insurance coverage had the preferred provider been used. (g) When ruling on a motion made pursuant to this section, in order to ensure that the health care needs of the child and the need for childcare for employment or reasonably necessary for education or training for employment skills pursuant to this section are met, the court shall consider all relevant facts, on both of the following categories: (1) With regard to health care, the court shall consider all relevant facts, including, but not limited to, the following: (A) The geographic access and reasonable availability of necessary health care for the child that complies with the terms of the health care insurance coverage paid for by either parent pursuant to a court order. Health insurance shall be rebuttably presumed to be accessible if services to be provided are within 50 miles of the residence of the child subject to the support order. If the court determines that health insurance is not accessible, the court shall state the reason on the record. (B) The necessity of emergency medical treatment that may have precluded the use of the health care insurance, or the preferred health care provider required under the insurance, provided by either parent pursuant to a court order. (C) The special medical needs of the child. (D) The reasonable inability of a parent to pay the full amount of reimbursement within a 30-day period and the resulting necessity for a court-ordered payment schedule. (2) With regard to childcare costs for employment or that are reasonably necessary for education or training for employment skills, the court shall consider all relevant facts, including, but not limited to, the following: (A) The nature and extent of job-related childcare needs, including, but not limited to, work schedule needs and the duration of education or training for employment skills. (B) The necessity and reasonableness of the cost under the circumstances of the case. (C) The special needs of the child. (D) The reasonable inability of a parent to pay the full amount of reimbursement within a 30-day period and the resulting necessity for a court-ordered payment schedule. (h) This section shall become operative September 1, 2024. (Repealed (in Sec. 12) and added by Stats. 2023, Ch. 213, Sec. 3. (SB 343) Effective January 1, 2024. Operative September 1, 2024, by its own provisions.)

Last verified: January 9, 2026

Key Terms

child support costsreimbursementitemized statementrebuttable presumptionuninsured health care needschildcare

Related Statutes

  • § 4057 Child Support Formula Presumption
  • § 1610 Premarital Agreement Definitions
  • § 1611 Premarital Agreement Requirements
  • § 1612 Premarital Property Rights Agreement
  • § 1613 Premarital Agreement Effectiveness

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Family Code. Section 4063.
View Official Source