LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeEvidence CodeDiv. 10Ch. 2Art. 3§ 1235 Prior Inconsistent Witness Statements

§ 1235 Prior Inconsistent Witness Statements

Evidence Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryVerified

§ 1235 Prior Inconsistent Witness Statements

Key Takeaways

  • •If someone says something different in court than what they said before, the old statement can be used as evidence.
  • •This only works if the old statement is different from what they are saying now in court.
  • •The old statement must follow the rules in Section 770 to be allowed.

Example

A person tells the police they saw a red car at a crash, but in court, they say it was a blue car.

The police can tell the court what the person said earlier about the red car because it’s different from what they’re saying now.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 1235 Prior Inconsistent Witness Statements

Evidence of a statement made by a witness is not made inadmissible by the hearsay rule if the statement is inconsistent with his testimony at the hearing and is offered in compliance with Section 770. (Enacted by Stats. 1965, Ch. 299.)

Last verified: January 22, 2026

Key Terms

hearsay ruleinconsistentSection 770

Related Statutes

  • § 1236 Consistent Witness Statements Admissible
  • § 1237 Witness Past Statement Admissibility
  • § 1238 Witness Identification Statements
  • § 1220 Admissions Against Party
  • § 1221 Adopted Statement Exception

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Evidence Code. Section 1235.
View Official Source