LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeCorporations CodeCh. 22.5§ 2288 Fund Payment Determination Rules

§ 2288 Fund Payment Determination Rules

Corporations Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryVerified

§ 2288 Fund Payment Determination Rules

This law says a court can only pay money from a special fund if the person suing has a real claim that fits the rules and has followed the proper steps, and it lets the Secretary of State defend the fund and sometimes ask the court to throw out weak claims.

Key Takeaways

  • •Payment from the fund only happens after the court finds a valid claim that follows the rules.
  • •The Secretary of State can defend the fund and can shift the burden of proof to the claimant in fraud cases.
  • •If a judgment was given by default or without a trial, the claimant must prove fraud, misrepresentation, or deceit.
  • •For criminal restitution orders, the claimant must prove the person named is actually an agent of the corporation.
  • •The Secretary of State can ask the court to dismiss a claim if it looks baseless, but must give at least 10 days notice.

Example

Jane sues a big company because she says they lied about a product and wants money from the company's fund. The court will only give her money if her claim is a real fraud claim under the rules and she filed everything correctly. The Secretary of State can step in to defend the fund, and if the court had already given a default judgment, Jane must prove the company actually lied.

The court checks Jane's claim against the rules, the Secretary of State can argue for the fund, and Jane may have to prove fraud herself if the earlier judgment was just a default. If the judgment was a criminal restitution order naming a company employee, Jane also has to show that employee was really the company's agent.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 2288 Fund Payment Determination Rules

(a) Whenever the court proceeds upon a petition under Section 2287, it shall order payment out of the fund only upon a determination that the aggrieved party has a valid cause of action within the purview of Section 2282, and has complied with Section 2287. (b) (1) The Secretary of State may defend any action on behalf of the fund and shall have recourse to all appropriate means of defense and review, including examination of witnesses and the right to relitigate any issues that are material and relevant in the proceeding against the fund. The claimant’s judgment shall create a rebuttable presumption of the fraud, misrepresentation, or deceit by the corporation, which presumption shall affect the burden of producing evidence. (2) If the civil judgment, arbitration award, or criminal restitution order in the underlying action on which the final judgment in favor of the petitioner was by default, stipulation, consent, or pursuant to Section 594 of the Code of Civil Procedure, or if the action against the corporation or its agent was defended by a trustee in bankruptcy, the petitioner shall have the burden of proving that the cause of action against the corporation or its agent was for fraud, misrepresentation, or deceit. (c) If the final judgment is a criminal restitution order against an agent, the petitioner shall have the burden of proving that the defendant named in the criminal restitution order qualifies as an agent as defined in this chapter. An active corporation, that has submitted a response to the application pursuant to Section 2282.2, may be permitted by the court to appear in the action regarding the sole issue of whether the defendant named in the criminal restitution order qualifies as its agent as defined in this chapter. (d) The Secretary of State may move the court at any time to dismiss the petition when it appears there are no triable issues and the petition is without merit. The motion may be supported by affidavit of any person or persons having knowledge of the facts, and may be made on the basis that the petition, and the judgment referred to therein, does not form the basis for a meritorious recovery claim within the purview of Section 2282; provided, however, the Secretary of State shall give written notice at least 10 calendar days before hearing on the motion to the claimant. (Amended by Stats. 2016, Ch. 390, Sec. 5. (AB 2759) Effective January 1, 2017.)

Last verified: January 10, 2026

Key Terms

judgmentrestitutioncorporationmisrepresentationthe secretarypetitionbankruptcyfine

Related Statutes

  • § 2293.1 Corporate Claim Repayment Requirement
  • § 2294 Restitution Fund Award Limits
  • § 12377 Corporate Agent Indemnification Rules
  • § 2280 Corporate Fraud Victim Restitution
  • § 2282.1 Corporation Payment Claim Notice

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Corporations Code. Section 2288.
View Official Source