LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeCivil CodeDiv. 3Pt. 4§ 2778 Indemnity Contract Interpretation Rules

§ 2778 Indemnity Contract Interpretation Rules

Civil Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryVerified

§ 2778 Indemnity Contract Interpretation Rules

Key Takeaways

  • •If someone promises to protect you from having to pay for something, they must help you if you get in trouble for it.
  • •If they promise to cover costs like lawsuits or damages, you usually have to pay first before they pay you back.
  • •They must help defend you in court if you ask, but you can choose to handle it yourself if you want.
  • •If they refuse to help when asked, and you lose in court, they still have to cover your loss.

Example

You hire a contractor to fix your roof, and they promise to cover any damage they cause. While working, they accidentally break your neighbor’s window, and your neighbor sues you.

The contractor must help you in court or pay for the window if you lose. If they ignore your request for help and you lose the case, they still have to pay for the damage.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 2778 Indemnity Contract Interpretation Rules

In the interpretation of a contract of indemnity, the following rules are to be applied, unless a contrary intention appears: 1. Upon an indemnity against liability, expressly, or in other equivalent terms, the person indemnified is entitled to recover upon becoming liable; 2. Upon an indemnity against claims, or demands, or damages, or costs, expressly, or in other equivalent terms, the person indemnified is not entitled to recover without payment thereof; 3. An indemnity against claims, or demands, or liability, expressly, or in other equivalent terms, embraces the costs of defense against such claims, demands, or liability incurred in good faith, and in the exercise of a reasonable discretion; 4. The person indemnifying is bound, on request of the person indemnified, to defend actions or proceedings brought against the latter in respect to the matters embraced by the indemnity, but the person indemnified has the right to conduct such defenses, if he chooses to do so; 5. If, after request, the person indemnifying neglects to defend the person indemnified, a recovery against the latter suffered by him in good faith, is conclusive in his favor against the former; 6. If the person indemnifying, whether he is a principal or a surety in the agreement, has not reasonable notice of the action or proceeding against the person indemnified, or is not allowed to control its defense, judgment against the latter is only presumptive evidence against the former; 7. A stipulation that a judgment against the person indemnified shall be conclusive upon the person indemnifying, is inapplicable if he had a good defense upon the merits, which by want of ordinary care he failed to establish in the action. (Enacted 1872.)

Last verified: January 21, 2026

Key Terms

indemnityliabilityclaimsdemandsdamagescostsdefendrecovery

Related Statutes

  • § 5985 Association Comparative Fault Reduction
  • § 6860 Association Damage Fault Reduction
  • § 1708.8 Privacy Invasion Liability
  • § 1708.85 Nonconsensual Intimate Image Distribution
  • § 1714.23 Emergency Allergy Treatment Rules

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Civil Code. Section 2778.
View Official Source