LawWiki
HomeCodesSearchGlossaryAPIAbout
LawWiki

Plain English summaries of California law with zero-hallucination AI. Every summary is verified against official source text.

Product

  • Search
  • Codes
  • About

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Disclaimer

© 2026 LawWiki. All rights reserved.

HomeBusiness and Professions CodeDiv. 2Ch. 5Art. 12§ 2292 Podiatric Competency Examination

§ 2292 Podiatric Competency Examination

Business and Professions Code·California
AI Summary·Official Text·Key Terms·Related Statutes·References
AI SummaryVerified

§ 2292 Podiatric Competency Examination

Key Takeaways

  • •Doctors can be forced to take a test if they might be bad at their job. This can happen if they make a big mistake, keep giving wrong medicine, hurt someone badly, or always give bad care.
  • •The test results can be used against the doctor in court or other meetings about their job.
  • •The doctor gets a chance to say why they shouldn't take the test before it's ordered.
  • •If the doctor refuses to take the test after being ordered, they can get in trouble for not following the rules.

Example

A doctor keeps giving the wrong medicine to patients, making them sick.

The doctor might be ordered to take a test to see if they are still good at their job. If they refuse, they can get in trouble.

AI-generated — May contain errors. Not legal advice. Always verify source.

Official Source
View on CA.gov

§ 2292 Podiatric Competency Examination

(a) A licensee may be ordered to undergo a professional competency examination if, after investigation and review by a medical expert designated by the division or the Board of Podiatric Medicine, as applicable, there is reasonable cause to believe that the licensee is unable to practice medicine with reasonable skill and safety to patients. Reasonable cause shall be demonstrated by one or more of the following: (1) a single incident of gross negligence; (2) a pattern of inappropriate prescribing; (3) an act of incompetence or negligence causing death or serious bodily injury; or (4) a pattern of substandard care. (b) The results of a competency examination shall be admissible as direct evidence and may be considered relevant in any subsequent disciplinary or interim proceeding against the licensee taking it, and, assuming it is determined to be relevant, shall be considered together with other relevant evidence in making a final determination. (c) Upon referral from the division, the matter shall be drafted and presented by the Senior Assistant Attorney General of the Health Quality Enforcement Section or his or her designee by way of a written petition detailing the reasonable cause. The petition shall contain all conclusions and facts upon which the presumption of reasonable cause is based. A copy of the petition shall be served on the physician who shall have the opportunity to file written opposition to the petition within 30 days after service. Service of the petition and any orders shall be in accordance with the methods of service authorized by subdivision (c) of Section 11505 of the Government Code. (d) A panel of the division shall review the petition and any opposition paper from the physician, or the panel of the division, or an administrative law judge to whom the petition is assigned by the division, may hold a hearing in accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act to determine if reasonable cause exists, as specified in subdivision (a). The physician shall have the right to be represented at that hearing by the person of his or her choice. If the panel of the division or administrative law judge is satisfied that reasonable cause exists as to the circumstances specified in subdivision (a), the division or panel shall issue an order compelling the physician to undergo an examination of professional competency as measured by community standards. For purposes of this section, “community standards” means the statewide standards of the community of licensees. Failure to comply with the order duly served on the physician shall constitute unprofessional conduct for purposes of disciplinary proceedings. (Amended by Stats. 1993, Ch. 1267, Sec. 29. Effective January 1, 1994.)

Last verified: January 22, 2026

Key Terms

professional competency examinationreasonable causegross negligenceinappropriate prescribingsubstandard careunprofessional conduct

Related Statutes

  • § 2220 Physician Discipline Enforcement
  • § 2220.05 Priority Discipline For High-Risk Doctors
  • § 2222 Podiatric Medicine Discipline Rules
  • § 2227.3 Administrative Letter Of Advice
  • § 2227.5 Complaint Retention Period

References

  • Official text at leginfo.legislature.ca.gov
  • California Legislature. Business and Professions Code. Section 2292.
View Official Source